yanqing's profile青青的共享空间PhotosBlogListsMore ![]() | Help |
|
青青的共享空间行走的水草 February 06 Some looks that I like- from College Fashion.com![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Fashion media takes the responsibility of building aesthetic value among readers. Nowadays, fashion is no longer to copy from others, but to create your own looks and styles which can definitely show your taste and personality. To find some shining or interesting accessories or clothing as your mark is a good way to build your own style. What my style is? I hope it is versatile, cute, cool and elegant. Necessity: Sky high heels-- my friends doubt that I can walk in so high shoes. I admit it is difficult, but it is not impossible. I can learn to wear them. Miniskirt-- puffy dress, girly look. legging-- black or grey always, since I am not a model! dark color makes me look more skinny. Blazer--Boyfriend style modern and cool i think these are enough to create different charming looks. February 05 New Year Concert at Culture CenterTonight I was lucky to be invited by a Swedish friend and
watched a concert held by Confucius Institute and Chinese Embassy in order to
celebrate the Chinese New Year next week. The whole performances lasted for
more than one hour and were mainly done by students from Beijing Sport
University.
The first show was traditional lion dance. The lively lion which was performed by two boys came down from the back of seats. The big head looked naughty and cute. His movements were quick and funny and made the audiences laugh many times. He played a ball with a boy on the stage, really wonderful.
Then came to Daizu Dance which I liked a lot. I saw the girls wearing green dress with pretty make up on faces. This kind of dance is very elegant and beautiful, showing a kind of Chinese sexiness and glamour. There were more shows of Kong fu, Taiji, Music, instruments and games even. The same girls performed Mongolian dances and Dunhuang also. The same boys and one girl performed different types of Wushu. I should say all the shows done by them were fantastic. We sat in the second row, so it was quite close to the stage. I could see their performance very clearly. This was also the first time that I had ever been so close to see the shows. I realized that it was very different to see a life show from to watch TV at home. As close to the stage, the music could drop at my heart deeply. Even the facial expression and muscle movement could be clearly seen so that I could be easily moved by the whole performance effect. The boys who played Wushu made their whole efforts and exploited all their energy. The girls who danced also showed their best, including beautiful smiles and strength of body movement. I was really indulged into the world full of flowing emotions and strong power. That was the magic of the stage, especially when there was no splendid flashing or lights to create certain visual effect. It was all about the charm of the performers. Though they were only university students, I think they were no worse than professional artists.
After the show, the applauding lasted for a long time. It obviously wowed the Swedish audiences. I was very proud of the young people. This was only very small part of Chinese culture and art. I really would like to appreciate the beauty and depth of the culture. I really would like to introduce it to the world. I think civilizations with quintessence should be shared with all human beings. February 02 Monster Lady GagaI read a good article on stars, finding that it is not only gossip, but more cultural critic. Here it is: Monsters Inc.? The Lady Gaga And Madonna Parade by Elizabeth Scalia Elizabeth Scalia lives on Long Island. She is a contributing writer for First Things Magazine and a panelist on In the Arena, a current-events program produced by NET-TV in the Diocese of Brooklyn. Scalia has run The Anchoress Blog since 2004. Someone sent an e-mail linking to Lady Gaga's appearance at Sunday night's Grammy Awards with the subject header "ugh." Is Lady Gaga an "ugh," though? She may be the most interesting pop idol to come down the pike in several decades. Certainly, Gaga is a bit derivative. Much of her choreography and staging owes acknowledgment to Madonna, Michael Jackson and David Bowie, and she is currently busting the record charts with what boils down to fleshed-out house music presented with verve and humor. While ironically lifting the idea from a text artist, U2's Bono once sang, "Every artist is a cannibal, every poet is a thief." Lady Gaga has done her share of thieving, but she may be a genius at deconstructing her pirate's swag into something that seems new. Nearly 30 years ago, we were told that Madonna was a "genius," particularly at marketing and reinventing herself, but time has not borne that out. Her music has held up well, but Madonna herself has been a dead-bore for decades, largely because her marketing and reinventing always come down to sex. But sex — thanks in part to Madonna, herself — has long ceased to be a daring or provocative subject. Madonna tried standing conventionality on its head with an idea that began and ended with embracing the inner sex object, but her art flowed along very conventional lines of what bad and good (or chastity and promiscuity) meant. Madonna's exploration of human sexuality lacked real depth; after her cone bras and pinstriped girdles, she had no more tricks up her sleeve. Gaga, on the other hand, is advising the world to embrace the inner monster, and this is a much more daring proposition; our objectifying ourselves as sexual beings might be easier to cop to — in any age — than the admission that we each of us house "inner monsters" of ego, selfishness, rage, manipulation or superior disdain. Lady Gaga has assigned herself the role of monster's cheerleader. She says, "Be the monster! I love your monster!" What she does not say — because she cannot yet know — is where the unleashing of millions of pent-up monsters may lead. Gaga will have to work on that if she is to sustain her hold on the public's imagination. Madonna could find no road back from the Land of Saturated Sex; if she had something interesting to say about post-menopausal sex, or how diminishing sex drives open other paths to fulfillment, she might be able to find resolution to her early ideas. But she seems uninterested in going there, and so we are forced to page past her yearly airbrushed crotch-shots as she beats a sad and worn-out theme to death. Lady Gaga is a good musician, therefore she understands the need for resolution. That may help her to move beyond the initial monster call-out. If she cannot, she will fall as quickly as she has risen, having unleashed onto a generation an idea that, like Madonna’s mindless sex fest, is ultimately empty, bleak and unhelpful. Even monsters need purpose and redemptive love, as Mary Shelley knew, or there is no place for them but exile. January 31 Fantastic Mr. FoxYesterday I watched an animation film produced by Indian Paintbrush and Regency Enterprises. The name of the film sounds interesting. ‘Fantastic Mr. Fox’. So definitely the hero in the film is a male fox. It is always funny to see animals’ lively acting as human kind. The main conflict in the story is the battle between three mean farmers and the animal community. When I was watching the film, I got a deep impression that it was so much alike the modern society- a miniature of marriage life. It is not only a comedy of animal story, it also hints at some aspects of human life.
Love makes the world go around, but is not powerful enough to change a person. Mrs Fox wanted Mr Fox not to steal food again two years ago. He made a promise and lived a normal family life from then on, working as a newspaper column writer. But when he moved the whole family to a big tree house near the three farms, he started stealing again. Of course, he did it secretly without his wife knowing this. But he made the farmers lost their tempers and they collaborated to eliminate the fox. Despite satisfaction of success in stealing actions, they faced up a heated battle against the strong enemies. Mrs Fox was definitely very disappointed at what Mr Fox had done. Her tears ran out of the eyes. Mr Fox was a little regretted too, but immediately he admitted that he was after all a wild animal and this was what he should do and was good at. He felt sorry for his wife and the family, but he had never given up. He made some great toast speeches, and commenced the battle. Women always hope their men be perfect and live up to their expectations. They always try to change men according to their imagination. Because of love, men would say yes and make promises. But with time passing by, he could not stand living under pressure and behave unfaithfully to his own heart, so he would return to what he used to be again. In order not to break his wife’s heart, he does it secretly. Once it is known by the woman, a war inevitably occurs. That is the core of dispute between man and woman. Because of love, woman is eager to force the man to be closer to her perfect standard. Marriage can be filled with her nag and endless words which, in her words, are good for him. When man cannot reach the standard, or even has done something worse, it is the woman that is hurt greatly. Woman is weak and fragile in emotion, but it is not always the man’s fault to cause hurt. Woman should know that it is impossible to change a person completely in terms of personality. The wise tip for a healthy and sustainable relationship between lovers is to give enough spaces to each other; respect and love how he is like, instead of loving how he will be like in the future.
True to yourself In reality, many people just yield to the usual life pace. Even if they do not live a happy life, they do not intend to have a change. They are afraid of failure after long pursuit of dreams. Hence I really appreciate Mr. Fox’s courage and decision to go back to himself. He is unlucky to cause all the troubles, but he is strong enough to stand out and take the responsibility of rescuing the family. He is a real man. He pursues his dream and his own life. He is able to think about ideas of making up for his mistakes. He can go ahead regardless of unpredictable dangers and difficulties. He is also smart and humorous, always carful about his family.
Plot summary(quote): It is the story of one Mr. Fox and his wild-ways of hen heckling, turkey taking and cider sipping, nocturnal, instinctive adventures. He has to put his wild days behind him and do what fathers do best: be responsible. He is too rebellious. He is too wild. He is going to try "just one more raid" on the three nastiest, meanest farmers that are Boggis, Bunce and Bean. It is a tale of crossing the line of family responsibilities and midnight adventure and the friendships and awakenings of this country life that is inhabited by Fantastic Mr. Fox and his friends. January 26 slow down It seems that Oskar is quite busy these days. I just encountered him ramdonly and talked to him a little bit. I asked about whether we should have some chat on the paper this week or not. He suggested next monday, since he has a lot to do this week. Of course no problem to me. He even said if we could not make the DIS conference, we could sumbit it to other conferences. This means that I can slow down my work pace and be more relaxed. He said he would go to Kalmar this thursday. I then mentioned the Chinese Town I heard long time ago. It was said a Chinese industry and business area would be built there, but seemed to be a rumour. Nothing has actually been done. O mentioned a Chinese guy bought a motel in a place where no other buildings were around. The guy rebuilt it and made it look like Chinese ancient building. O once drove his car to a place and passed it. When he saw it, he was astonished by the scenery. You can imagine! In a vast area of countryside, an exotic architecture stands up agaist the blue sky...
Interesting. I was wondering who was so rich to buy that and why he was interested in this.
Yesterday, another new lady came to our group. She works in the same project as Elin. She is not swedish, but I really did not know which country she was from when she told me. I ve never heard of it. Good, another person that is not Swedish. Second hand bookLast weekends, it was very sunny, so I went out for a walk. On the way to the center, we passed a second hand book shop. It was not big, but through the glass window, I could see a sea of books on shelves. I did not know why I entered, but I just did. The owner of the book shop asked me what I wanted in Swedish. I responded to him that I just looked around. I did not expect that he started talking, saying that its better to have the name of the book in mind so that he could search for me. He then asked me what I did in Sweden and how I liked here. I said I loved sweden and I worked here.
He then talked about Chinese and Swedish in history, the 26 years history of the book store which was handed down from his grandpa. His family was moved to Stockholm from Russia etc. It seemed he had experienced a lot. I could tell from his words and his facial expressions.
The books here were almost all in yellow and looked very old. No body here, seldom customers, what never lacked here was quietness and peace. He said one thing- nowadays, no people read books; no one buy second hand books; it is hard to survive for such a small store. I could not deny this. Looking around, I felt like the environment myself. I always wanted to buy some English books to read on a subway or at home after work. But it was always too expensive to buy a book here. Even a fashion magazine would cost over 70 kr.
Holding a book, flipping the pages, breathing the light smell coming from the old paper...
That was long long time ago...
I am not a nostalgic person, but I do like to take in more nutrition from reading and enjoy the moment of experiencing another world. That is the true moment for people to calm down and think. I envied him. I wish I could have a private library like this or open a book bar. I came across a book entitled Culture Theory and I picked it up and read the content page. This was what I was interested, culture, emotion, language… The publish house was Cambridge which was even more convincible. I believed this was a good book, so I asked the price. He said 80 kr first, then I did not respond to him. He said it was a good book and later lowered the price to 50 kr. Actually I was thinking bargain the price to 50kr. So just like what I thought. I was not hesitant at all and bought it. I was happy that I could have something to read in my spare time.
January 25 happy day It was really a good day today. The first thing is that I finally got my first salary in Sweden. I checked my internet bank account this morning and found the number had already changed, then I was relaxed, otherwise I had to go to the bank again. Retrospecting the past few days, I think I really have the right attitude and work hard. I go to work early in the morning everyday and finish what I should do before schedule. My teacher was satisfied with me. We talked about the issues of the paper many times and I could show my own opinions. I knew more new people and tried to get well with them. But I still have some problem in socializing. I think I am not so extroversive that can make friends with new people immediately. Sometimes, my teacher asked me whether I would go with them to have lunch outside or not. I was always very reluctant to say 'yes'. On the one hand, it is very expensive to eat outside. I cannot afford to eat out every time; on the other hand, I don't eat much and I don't like the food here. I still insist on Chinese style of life and eating habit. I don't like any cream, source, jam, soppa or meat. The only thing for having lunch with them is perhaps to socialize, just like in China. Actually having dinner is also one important way to communicate during work time, since it is very rare for colleagues to hang out together after work. Everyone is busy with their own business. Thus I show up almost every time in Fika. I found I always lack of topics when talking to many people. I should have been more open. I think I will change and get one well with them little by little. Everything is going well on track and I am happy about that. The second thing is that I finally got my shoes which I ordered from TOPSHOP. UK website three weeks ago. I did not expect it took so long time, so I even wrote an email to Customer Service to complain. But they said it was possible for international delivery to take up to three weeks' time to send to the right place. Anyway, I got them at night. I was so excited to receive them. They were carefully packed in the parcel with a lot of paper wrapped around. They were exactly the same as what I had seen in the store in Stockholm. I tried them on and felt super satisfied. They are perhaps the highest shoes I have ever had. I love high heels very much. This is just what I have been dreaming to have-- sky high platform sandal. The only thing is it is still covered with thick snow everywhere in Stockholm now, when I can wear them? It still has a long time to enter spring. Last year, it still snowed in April. I think perhaps I have to store them until April or May. I don't go to parties nowadays, so I have no chance to wear them. But anyway, I am happy to have them. I went back home early and bought a legging trousers in Monki. I tried it many days ago when it was still 100 kr, but now the price dropped to 60kr. Though only XS left, I still bought one. Hope the happiness will last long. January 24 Blazer- make you glamorousRecently, I bought a grey blazer from the brand of STOKLM in MQ store. I don't know why I am so interested in blazer now, completely different from one or two years ago. I once loved cute fun feminine dress with lots of lace and bright color. I liked the doll style or Lolita style. In fact, I still like that, but I prefer mix the cute element with masculine piece now. So blazer comes into my eyes. A blazer usually looks like a boy and actually is a kind of uniform from male wardrobe. In this changing fashion world, clothing has been making fun of itself in different ways. Innovation and reminiscence go together. Nowadays, female is no longer the pretty doll of male at home, but also independent and intelligent individual in society. Women can be sexy and gentle, but also powerful and smart. Blazer, then, is a good statement for this. I think blazer is a good must have piece in ladies’ wardrobe. It can form different looks and show different styles. 1. Blazer
+ dress -- sexy 2. Blazer
+ miniskirt or skirt -- cute, school 3. Blazer
+ mini shorts -- sports, cool 4. Blazer
+ skinny pants or pencil pants -- powerful, independent 5. Blazer + leggings 5. Blazer
+ jeans-- casual 6. Blazer + blouse Catwalk S/S 2010 Calvin Klein D & G Armani What is a blazer A blazer is a type of jacket, worn as smart casual dress. The term blazer occasionally is synonymous with boating jacket and sports jacket, two different garments. A blazer resembles a suit coat cut more casually — sometimes with flap-less patch pockets and metal buttons. A blazer's cloth is usually durable (14oz.), because it is an outdoor sports jacket. Stylistically, blazers often are uniform garments, i.e. airline, school, and yachting, and rowing clubs. The term blazer identifies two distinct jackets; the first, original blazer, was a single-breasted boat club jacket, worn for rowing, of brightly-colored, often striped cloth, with contrasting piping; essentially an early sports jacket. The second blazer is a fitted, classically-cut, double-breasted navy blue jacket, originally called reefer jacket, now an occasional usage. As men discontinued wearing the original boat-club blazer, the term then applied solely to the double-breasted naval version dressed with metal buttons; the military originals were black. January 21 first show up in Workshop- not bad! Busy busy days!! I feel quite relaxed now, because we have finished the workshop today. The workshop is held for discussing some academic questions before the deadline of submission of the papers for international conferences. Our fashion paper was also one of the papers this time. For each paper, Oskar pointed two people as opponents. In order to prepare for the comment, I had to read two articles yesterday. It was quite difficult for me, since I was really unfamiliar with the technological topics and the writing style of scientific research. It took me three hours to read one paper last night. I made some notes and tried to make some constructive advice. There were too many professional words that I had to look up into the dictionary. Finally, i came to know what was going on in the paper. I kept on reading another one in the morning. I even found some materials about how to write good scientific paper on the websites. I knew that being opponent, I should pay more attention to academic writing which includes hypothesis,demonstration and result. It should be clear about the method and how the result comes out. I also read our paper again, finding there are still some places that are wrong in my version. Perhaps Oskar did not notice the changing place and did not copy the right thing. Anyway, we had to do a lot of work. The workshop went on very well. Everyone was actively involved into the discussion. Most of them had some very good suggestion and very professional. But I guess our paper was misunderstood by many people. They just said much about what they were interested instead of focusing on our methodology. Actually, content analysis is very strict that you cannot go too far when you interpret the material. You should always relate to the materials. Oskar noticed this and told me just ignore the comments in this aspect. We had a tight schedule, but finally we finished within three hours. Al of us were satisfied with this,but still some people gave some advice to improve. For me, I think the biggest problem is the time. If we had more time to read all the papers, the effect could be even better. Compared to those experienced researchers, scholars (PhDs, Professors etc), I am just a tiny fresh man. I just said what I thought and spoke in a natural way. I was not nervous in front of those guys and I was used to the discussion situation. Too much like this when I was a student. To my surprise, Oskar praised me a lot after finishing. He said I was not like the one who attended the workshop for the first time. He said I was brave enough to ask questions. I thought he might be a little exaggerated. But later, when we had fika in the opposite room, he mentioned this again. The two ladies sitting there just echoed. So I could see he was satisfied with me which made me very happy. We had further discussion after that. We have got some good comments from Ad and we should do more work for the data collection. I discussed some points that I was still not sure. He thought we could submit it into DIS- a even more important conference. He said the problem is that conference is more difficult to get into and has of course much higher requirement or standard. I don't care. I think as long as we work more, we can make it a very good article. Anyway, now we have decided that we should go to DIS. The positive thing is that we can have more time to rewrite. I always treat my work very seriously. I took notes during the workshop and I wrote down what I should do the next step so that I can always keep something in mind. I came back early today. I need some rest. January 18 monday Another week! A new girl came to our group today. I was happy about it, since our group is growing. But a Swedish again! I have to admit that the swedish is dominant in the center. But what can I say? It is a Swedish Institute. We are in this country. We have to adapt to the cultural and social situation. We should learn Swedish language as we live in the country. Maybe I should spare some time to review swedish. I had a discussion with Oskar in the afternoon. I was surprised to see he actually had generated some new ideas and led my argument in the paper to somewhere else which was different from what I expected to prove. We spent much space in demonstrating how mobile phone is linked to fashion system. Then he said that there were some ambiguities in some points which actually proves that mobile phone is not necessarily a fashionable item. i found a paper on the internet yesterday, talking about mobile phone and fashion. It seems to be exactly what we are doing in the project. But I could see some points not fully demonstrated and it is too theoretical in a sense, talking almost every aspects of fashion. As O said, the previous research on this topic had already argued mobile phone was a fashion item, now what we would do in the paper was to doubt it and say mobile phone is not completely a fashion item. I was shocked when I heard what he was explaining. As a trained master student, I am very clear about what a good paper should be. If building the paper on the structure like this, it will be very risky. If we could not make good arrangement on the argument and the structure, it would fail to be a paper without a focus or main idea. I explained my thoughts to him, and he praised me a lot for raising the question,saying that even some PhD students could not dare to find the exact main argument of the paper. I was happy about this. I am always very serious and strict with myself and Im not afraid of expressing my own ideas. I think no matter where I work, I should learn how to express myself in a skillful way. He explained to me. Though I was still in doubt, I would respect him. He was working on the paper after that. He is really a hard-working person. I am sure I can learn a lot from him. |
|
||||
|
|